Time is for when section ends

1. Share outs 6:06

   1. People are excited about the space and come of the content

2. How comfortable people are with the material 6:13

   1. Feel confident
   2. Haven't engaged with content before
   3. Has been introduced but didn't know what to do with it
   4. Doomer → Sharing opinion and taking action

3. Ground rules for talking 6:20

   1. We can't be too depressing
   2. Want support through unity check
   3. culture creating of how we want to hold that space
   4. Don't steal-man arguments
   5. Don't change subject too drastically
   6. Disagree with the most generous interpretation
   7. Play a respectable devils advocate

4. How did we feel about reading things? 6:41

   1. How do we feel about the ideas of collapse

      1. Feeling like no one is paying attention to these things and it can be depressive.

         1. Solidarity check
         2. I have faith but I'm not stupid → hope seems hard to find with predictions

      2. Is framing this situation useful in terms of collapse?

         1. Does this motivate people?

      3. Useful to see these things clearly but tough to live with. People have existed with existential threat before cold war

      4. Recognize the truth of the issue but I still have faith. Haven't seen this perspective in Sunrise. Most people can understand the scope of the changes. Make it emotional but also digestible to win over the rest of the population

      5. Making people understand what the human impacts of these changes will be (knowing something vs seeing and understanding) also what kind of action can you take

      6. Emotional Reaction 6:48

         1. not wanting to have kids
         2. "Politics is feelings backed up by facts"
         3. People see it and then forget about it (Shi) 6:48
            1. People and their family experience negative effects from pollution but can't see the connection to their live
            2. People don't care
         4. People change when the people around them inform the habits and understanding (deep community)
            1. Can people care about hold your deep interests at heart?
            2. Tyler → nodes of trust (social science)
         5. Article 6:55
            1. Vice article arch
            2. Deep adaptation → felt that it didn't understand science
               1. Felt that the conclusions weren't well drawn
            3. I'm past being critical (shi)

      7. Trust in the sources 7:08

         1. How can do things about collapse?
            1. How are we living our values individually? (Jon)
         2. Talking about collapse puts us into a trap that allows people to discredit the movement
            1. People will think that we are radicals
         3. Habits and patterns define thinking even when proved wrong
            1. social aspect comes first

      8. 30 second break to check in

      9. Did anyone want to be critical? 7:32

         1. We are playing with a very small boundary zone

         2. People didn't understand the graphs

         3. Green New Deal is only part we need also personal change

         4. Community is important

         5. Need an all win system that is based off of human cooperation and cultural change

         6. What is the "right" interpretation

            1. Get into difficult discussions

         

      10. Closing

          1. Introducing other curriculum
          2. Plugging Jem bendel deep adaption curriculum

      11. Presentation ( I was tired at this point) → 1.5 is probably the most we can push this=

          1. Climate misinformation
             1. T

   Do the Math